Engineers Tricks: August 2010

Affinity Ad

Search This Blog

subscribe via sms What_An_Idea_Sirji

Subscribe via Google SMS Channel

WiMAX

WiMAX

WiMAX (Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access) is a telecommunications protocol that provides fixed and fully mobile internet access. The current WiMAX revision provides up to 40 Mbit/s[1][2] with the IEEE 802.16m update expected offer up to 1 Gbit/s fixed speeds. The name "WiMAX" was created by the WiMAX Forum, which was formed in June 2001 to promote conformity and interoperability of the standard. The forum describes WiMAX[3] as "a standards-based technology enabling the delivery of last mile wireless broadband access as an alternative to cable and DSL".[4]


WiMAX base station equipment with a sector antenna and wireless modem on top


A pre-WiMAX CPE of a 26 km (16 mi) connection mounted 13 metres (43 ft) above the ground (2004, Lithuania).
Contents
• 1 Terminology
• 2 Uses
o 2.1 Broadband
o 2.2 Backhaul
o 2.3 Triple-play
o 2.4 Rapid deployment
• 3 Connecting to WiMAX
o 3.1 WiMAX Gateways
o 3.2 WiMAX Dongles
o 3.3 WiMAX Mobiles
• 4 Technical information
o 4.1 WiMAX and the IEEE 802.16 Standard
o 4.2 Physical layer
o 4.3 MAC (data link) layer
o 4.4 Deployment
o 4.5 Integration with an IP-based network
o 4.6 Spectrum allocation
o 4.7 Spectral efficiency
o 4.8 Inherent Limitations
o 4.9 Silicon implementations
o 4.10 Comparison with Wi-Fi
• 5 Conformance testing
• 6 Associations
o 6.1 WiMAX Forum
o 6.2 WiMAX Spectrum Owners Alliance
• 7 Competing technologies
o 7.1 Harmonization
o 7.2 Comparison
• 8 Future development
• 9 Interference
• 10 Deployments
• 11 See also
• 12 References
• 13 External links

Terminology

WiMAX refers to interoperable implementations of the IEEE 802.16 wireless-networks standard (ratified by the WiMAX Forum), in similarity with Wi-Fi, which refers to interoperable impleme]] Wireless LAN standard (ratified by the Wi-Fi Alliance). The WiMAX Forum certification allows vendors to sell their equipment as WiMAX (Fixed or Mobile) certified, thus ensuring a level of interoperability with other certified products, as long as they fit the same profile.
The IEEE 802.16 standard forms the basis of 'WiMAX' and is sometimes referred to colloquially as "WiMAX", "Fixed WiMAX", "Mobile WiMAX", "802.16d" and "802.16e."[5] Clarification of the formal names are as follow:
• 802.16-2004 is also known as 802.16d, which refers to the working party that has developed that standard. It is sometimes referred to as "Fixed WiMAX," since it has no support for mobility.
• 802.16e-2005, often abbreviated to 802.16e, is an amendment to 802.16-2004. It introduced support for mobility, among other things and is therefore also known as "Mobile WiMAX".
Mobile WiMAX is the WiMAX incarnation that has the most commercial interest to date and is being actively deployed in many countries. Mobile WiMAX is also the basis of future revisions of WiMAX. As such, references to and comparisons with "WiMAX" in this Wikipedia article mean "Mobile WiMAX".

Uses

The bandwidth and range of WiMAX make it suitable for the following potential applications:
• Providing portable mobile broadband connectivity across cities and countries through a variety of devices.
• Providing a wireless alternative to cable and DSL for "last mile" broadband access.
• Providing data, telecommunications (VoIP) and IPTV services (triple play).
• Providing a source of Internet connectivity as part of a business continuity plan.

Broadband

Companies are deploying WiMAX to provide mobile broadband or at-home broadband connectivity across whole cities or countries. In many cases this has resulted in competition in markets which typically only had access to broadband through an existing incumbent DSL (or similar) operator.
Additionally, given the relatively low cost to deploy a WiMAX network (in comparison to GSM, DSL or Fiber-Optic), it is now possible to provide broadband in places where it may have not been economically viable.

Backhaul

WiMAX is a possible replacement candidate for cellular phone technologies such as GSM and CDMA, or can be used as an overlay to increase capacity. Fixed WiMAX is also considered as a wireless backhaul technology for 2G, 3G, and 4G networks in both developed and developing nations.[6][7]
In North America, backhaul for urban cellular operations is typically provided via one or more copper wire line T1 connections, whereas remote cellular operations are sometimes backhauled via satellite. In most other regions, urban and rural backhaul is usually provided by microwave links. (The exception to this is where the network is operated by an incumbent with ready access to the copper network, in which case T1 lines may be used.) WiMAX is a broadband platform and as such has much more substantial backhaul bandwidth requirements than legacy cellular applications. Therefore, traditional copper wire line backhaul solutions are not appropriate. Consequently the use of wireless microwave backhaul is on the rise in North America and existing microwave backhaul links in all regions are being upgraded.[8] Capacities of between 34 Mbit/s and 1 Gbit/s[citation needed] are routinely being deployed with latencies in the order of 1 ms. In many cases, operators are aggregating sites using wireless technology and then presenting traffic on to fiber networks where convenient.

Triple-play

WiMAX supports the technologies that make triple-play service offerings possible (such as Quality of Service and Multicasting).
As a result, it is possible for a WiMAX operator to not only provide high-speed broadband internet access, but also VoIP and IPTV services to customers with relative ease. This enables a WiMAX service to be a replacement for DSL, Cable and Telephony services.
On May 7, 2008 in the United States, Sprint Nextel, Google, Intel, Comcast, Bright House, and Time Warner announced a pooling of an average of 120 MHz of spectrum and merged with Clearwire to form a company which will take the name Clear. The new company hopes to benefit from combined services offerings and network resources as a springboard past its competitors. The cable companies will provide media services to other partners while gaining access to the wireless network as a Mobile virtual network operator to provide triple-play services.
Some analysts have questioned how the deal will work out: Although fixed-mobile convergence has been a recognized factor in the industry, prior attempts to form partnerships among wireless and cable companies have generally failed to lead to significant benefits to the participants. Other analysts point out that as wireless progresses to higher bandwidth, it inevitably competes more directly with cable and DSL, inspiring competitors into collaboration. Also, as wireless broadband networks grow denser and usage habits shift, the need for increased backhaul and media service will accelerate, therefore the opportunity to leverage cable assets is expected to increase.

Rapid deployment

• WiMAX access was used to assist with communications[citation needed] in Aceh, Indonesia, after the tsunami in December 2004. All communication infrastructure in the area, other than amateur radio, was destroyed[citation needed], making the survivors unable to communicate with people outside the disaster area and vice versa. WiMAX provided broadband access that helped regenerate communication to and from Aceh.[citation needed]
• WiMAX hardware was donated by Intel Corporation to assist the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and FEMA in their communications efforts in the areas affected by Hurricane Katrina.[9] In practice, volunteers used mainly self-healing mesh, Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP), and a satellite uplink combined with Wi-Fi on the local link.[10]

Connecting to WiMAX


A WiMAX Gateway which provides VoIP, Ethernet and WiFi connectivity


A WiMAX USB modem for mobile internet
There are numerous devices on the market that provide connectivity to a WiMAX network. These are known as the "subscriber unit" (SU).
There is an increasing focus on portable units. This includes handsets (similar to cellular smartphones); PC peripherals (PC Cards or USB dongles); and embedded devices in laptops, which are now available for Wi-Fi services. In addition, there is much emphasis by operators on consumer electronics devices such as Gaming consoles, MP3 players and similar devices. It is notable that WiMAX is more similar to Wi-Fi than to 3G cellular technologies.
The WiMAX Forum website provides a list of certified devices. However, this is not a complete list of devices available as certified modules are embedded into laptops, MIDs (Mobile internet devices), and other private labeled devices.

WiMAX Gateways

WiMAX gateway devices are available as both indoor and outdoor versions from several manufacturers. Many of the WiMAX gateways that are offered by manufactures such as ZyXEL, Motorola, and Greenpacket are stand-alone self-install indoor units. Such devices typically sit near the customer's window with the best WiMAX signal, and provide:
• An integrated Wi-Fi access point to provide the WiMAX Internet connectivity to multiple devices throughout the home or business.
• Ethernet ports should you wish to connect directly to your computer or DVR instead.
• One or two PSTN telephone jacks to connect your land-line phone and take advantage of VoIP.
Indoor gateways are convenient, but radio losses mean that the subscriber may need to be significantly closer to the WiMAX base station than with professionally-installed external units.
Outdoor units are roughly the size of a laptop PC, and their installation is comparable to the installation of a residential satellite dish. A higher-gain directional outdoor unit will generally result in greatly increased range and throughput but with the obvious loss of practical mobility of the unit.

WiMAX Dongles

There are a variety of USB dongles on the market which provide connectivity to a WiMAX network. Generally these devices are connected to a notebook or netbook whilst on the go. Dongles typically have omnidirectional antennae which are of lower-gain compared to other devices, as such these devices are best used in areas of good coverage.

WiMAX Mobiles

HTC announced the first WiMAX enabled mobile phone, the Max 4G, on Nov 12th 2008.[11] The device was only available to certain markets in Russia on the Yota network.
HTC released the second WiMAX enabled mobile phone, the EVO 4G, March 23, 2010 at the CTIA conference in Las Vegas. The device made available on June 4, 2010[12] is capable of both EV-DO(3G) and WiMAX(4G) as well as simultaneous data & voice sessions. The device also has a front-facing camera enabling the use of video conversations.[13] A number of WiMAX Mobiles are expected to hit the US market in 2010.[14]

Technical information


Illustration of a WiMAX MIMO board

WiMAX and the IEEE 802.16 Standard

The current WiMAX revision is based upon IEEE Std 802.16e-2005,[15] approved in December 2005. It is a supplement to the IEEE Std 802.16-2004,[16] and so the actual standard is 802.16-2004 as amended by 802.16e-2005. Thus, these specifications need to be considered together.
IEEE 802.16e-2005 improves upon IEEE 802.16-2004 by:
• Adding support for mobility (soft and hard handover between base stations). This is seen as one of the most important aspects of 802.16e-2005, and is the very basis of Mobile WiMAX.
• Scaling of the Fast Fourier transform (FFT) to the channel bandwidth in order to keep the carrier spacing constant across different channel bandwidths (typically 1.25 MHz, 5 MHz, 10 MHz or 20 MHz). Constant carrier spacing results in a higher spectrum efficiency in wide channels, and a cost reduction in narrow channels. Also known as Scalable OFDMA (SOFDMA). Other bands not multiples of 1.25 MHz are defined in the standard, but because the allowed FFT subcarrier numbers are only 128, 512, 1024 and 2048, other frequency bands will not have exactly the same carrier spacing, which might not be optimal for implementations.
• Advanced antenna diversity schemes, and hybrid automatic repeat-request (HARQ)
• Adaptive Antenna Systems (AAS) and MIMO technology
• Denser sub-channelization, thereby improving indoor penetration
• Introducing Turbo Coding and Low-Density Parity Check (LDPC)
• Introducing downlink sub-channelization, allowing administrators to trade coverage for capacity or vice versa
• Fast Fourier transform algorithm
• Adding an extra QoS class for VoIP applications.
SOFDMA (used in 802.16e-2005) and OFDM256 (802.16d) are not compatible thus equipment will have to be replaced if an operator is to move to the later standard (e.g., Fixed WiMAX to Mobile WiMAX).

Physical layer

The original version of the standard on which WiMAX is based (IEEE 802.16) specified a physical layer operating in the 10 to 66 GHz range. 802.16a, updated in 2004 to 802.16-2004, added specifications for the 2 to 11 GHz range. 802.16-2004 was updated by 802.16e-2005 in 2005 and uses scalable orthogonal frequency-division multiple access (SOFDMA) as opposed to the fixed orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (OFDM) version with 256 sub-carriers (of which 200 are used) in 802.16d. More advanced versions, including 802.16e, also bring multiple antenna support through MIMO (See WiMAX MIMO). This brings potential benefits in terms of coverage, self installation, power consumption, frequency re-use and bandwidth efficiency.

MAC (data link) layer

The WiMAX MAC uses a scheduling algorithm for which the subscriber station needs to compete only once for initial entry into the network. After network entry is allowed, the subscriber station is allocated an access slot by the base station. The time slot can enlarge and contract, but remains assigned to the subscriber station, which means that other subscribers cannot use it. In addition to being stable under overload and over-subscription, the scheduling algorithm can also be more bandwidth efficient. The scheduling algorithm also allows the base station to control Quality of service (QoS) parameters by balancing the time-slot assignments among the application needs of the subscriber stations.

Deployment

As a standard intended to satisfy needs of next-generation data networks (4G), WiMAX is distinguished by its dynamic burst algorithm modulation adaptive to the physical environment the RF signal travels through. Modulation is chosen to be more spectrally efficient (more bits per OFDM/SOFDMA symbol). That is, when the bursts have a high signal strength and a high carrier to noise plus interference ratio (CINR), they can be more easily decoded using digital signal processing (DSP). In contrast, operating in less favorable environments for RF communication, the system automatically steps down to a more robust mode (burst profile) which means fewer bits per OFDM/SOFDMA symbol; with the advantage that power per bit is higher and therefore simpler accurate signal processing can be performed.
Burst profiles are used inverse (algorithmically dynamic) to low signal attenuation; meaning throughput between clients and the base station is determined largely by distance. Maximum distance is achieved by the use of the most robust burst setting; that is, the profile with the largest MAC frame allocation trade-off requiring more symbols (a larger portion of the MAC frame) to be allocated in transmitting a given amount of data than if the client were closer to the base station.
The client's MAC frame and their individual burst profiles are defined as well as the specific time allocation. However, even if this is done automatically then the practical deployment should avoid high interference and multipath environments. The reason for which is obviously that too much interference causes the network function poorly and can also misrepresent the capability of the network.
The system is complex to deploy as it is necessary to track not only the signal strength and CINR (as in systems like GSM) but also how the available frequencies will be dynamically assigned (resulting in dynamic changes to the available bandwidth.) This could lead to cluttered frequencies with slow response times or lost frames.
As a result the system has to be initially designed in consensus with the base station product team to accurately project frequency use, interference, and general product functionality.

Integration with an IP-based network

The WiMAX Forum WiMAX Architecture
The WiMAX Forum has proposed an architecture that defines how a WiMAX network can be connected with an IP based core network, which is typically chosen by operators that serve as Internet Service Providers (ISP); Nevertheless the WiMAX BS provide seamless integration capabilities with other types of architectures as with packet switched Mobile Networks.
The WiMAX forum proposal defines a number of components, plus some of the interconnections (or reference points) between these, labeled R1 to R5 and R8:
• SS/MS: the Subscriber Station/Mobile Station
• ASN: the Access Service Network[17]
• BS: Base station, part of the ASN
• ASN-GW: the ASN Gateway, part of the ASN
• CSN: the Connectivity Service Network
• HA: Home Agent, part of the CSN
• AAA: Authentication, Authorization and Accounting Server, part of the CSN
• NAP: a Network Access Provider
• NSP: a Network Service Provider
It is important to note that the functional architecture can be designed into various hardware configurations rather than fixed configurations. For example, the architecture is flexible enough to allow remote/mobile stations of varying scale and functionality and Base Stations of varying size - e.g. femto, pico, and mini BS as well as macros.

Spectrum allocation

There is no uniform global licensed spectrum for WiMAX, however the WiMAX Forum has published three licensed spectrum profiles: 2.3 GHz, 2.5 GHz and 3.5 GHz, in an effort to drive standardisation and decrease cost.
In the USA, the biggest segment available is around 2.5 GHz,[18] and is already assigned, primarily to Sprint Nextel and Clearwire. Elsewhere in the world, the most-likely bands used will be the Forum approved ones, with 2.3 GHz probably being most important in Asia. Some countries in Asia like India and Indonesia will use a mix of 2.5 GHz, 3.3 GHz and other frequencies. Pakistan's Wateen Telecom uses 3.5 GHz.
Analog TV bands (700 MHz) may become available for WiMAX usage, but await the complete roll out of digital TV, and there will be other uses suggested for that spectrum. In the USA the FCC auction for this spectrum began in January 2008 and, as a result, the biggest share of the spectrum went to Verizon Wireless and the next biggest to AT&T.[19] Both of these companies have stated their intention of supporting LTE, a technology which competes directly with WiMAX. EU commissioner Viviane Reding has suggested re-allocation of 500–800 MHz spectrum for wireless communication, including WiMAX.[20]
WiMAX profiles define channel size, TDD/FDD and other necessary attributes in order to have inter-operating products. The current fixed profiles are defined for both TDD and FDD profiles. At this point, all of the mobile profiles are TDD only. The fixed profiles have channel sizes of 3.5 MHz, 5 MHz, 7 MHz and 10 MHz. The mobile profiles are 5 MHz, 8.75 MHz and 10 MHz. (Note: the 802.16 standard allows a far wider variety of channels, but only the above subsets are supported as WiMAX profiles.)
Since October 2007, the Radio communication Sector of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU-R) has decided to include WiMAX technology in the IMT-2000 set of standards.[21] This enables spectrum owners (specifically in the 2.5-2.69 GHz band at this stage) to use WiMAX equipment in any country that recognizes the IMT-2000.

Spectral efficiency

One of the significant advantages of advanced wireless systems such as WiMAX is spectral efficiency. For example, 802.16-2004 (fixed) has a spectral efficiency of 3.7 (bit/s)/Hertz, and other 3.5–4G wireless systems offer spectral efficiencies that are similar to within a few tenths of a percent. The notable advantage of WiMAX comes from combining SOFDMA with smart antenna technologies. This multiplies the effective spectral efficiency through multiple reuse and smart network deployment topologies. The direct use of frequency domain organization simplifies designs using MIMO-AAS compared to CDMA/WCDMA methods, resulting in more effective systems.

Inherent Limitations

A commonly-held misconception is that WiMAX will deliver 70 Mbit/s over 50 kilometers. Like all wireless technologies, WiMAX can either operate at higher bitrates or over longer distances but not both: operating at the maximum range of 50 km (31 miles) increases bit error rate and thus results in a much lower bitrate. Conversely, reducing the range (to under 1 km) allows a device to operate at higher bitrates.
A recent city-wide deployment of WiMAX in Perth, Australia, has demonstrated that customers at the cell-edge with an indoor CPE typically obtain speeds of around 1–4 Mbit/s, with users closer to the cell tower obtaining speeds of up to 30 Mbit/s.[citation needed]
Like all wireless systems, available bandwidth is shared between users in a given radio sector, so performance could deteriorate in the case of many active users in a single sector. However, with adequate capacity planning and the use of WiMAX's Quality of Service, a minimum guaranteed throughput for each subscriber can be put in place. In practice, most users will have a range of 4-8 Mbit/s services and additional radio cards will be added to the base station to increase the number of users that may be served as required.

Silicon implementations

A critical requirement for the success of a new technology is the availability of low-cost chipsets and silicon implementations.
WiMAX has a strong silicon ecosystem with a number of specialized companies producing baseband ICs and integrated RFICs for implementing full-featured WiMAX Subscriber Stations in the 2.3, 2.5 and 3.5Ghz band (refer to 'Spectrum allocation' above). It is notable that most of the major semiconductor companies have not developed WiMAX chipsets of their own and have instead chosen to invest in and/or utilise the well developed products from smaller specialists or start-up suppliers. These companies include but not limited to Beceem, Sequans and PicoChip. The chipsets from these companies are used in the majority of WiMAX devices.
Intel Corporation is a leader in promoting WiMAX, but has limited its WiMAX chipset development and instead chosen to invest in these specialized companies producing silicon compatible with the various WiMAX deployments throughout the globe.

Comparison with Wi-Fi

Comparisons and confusion between WiMAX and Wi-Fi are frequent because both are related to wireless connectivity and Internet access.
• WiMAX is a long range system, covering many kilometres, that uses licensed or unlicensed spectrum to deliver connection to a network, in most cases the Internet.
• Wi-Fi uses unlicensed spectrum to provide access to a local network.
• Wi-Fi is more popular in end user devices.
• Wi-Fi runs on the Media Access Control's CSMA/CA protocol, which is connectionless and contention based, whereas WiMAX runs a connection-oriented MAC.
• WiMAX and Wi-Fi have quite different quality of service (QoS) mechanisms:
o WiMAX uses a QoS mechanism based on connections between the base station and the user device. Each connection is based on specific scheduling algorithms.
o Wi-Fi uses contention access - all subscriber stations that wish to pass data through a wireless access point (AP) are competing for the AP's attention on a random interrupt basis. This can cause subscriber stations distant from the AP to be repeatedly interrupted by closer stations, greatly reducing their throughput.
• Both 802.11 and 802.16 define Peer-to-Peer (P2P) and ad hoc networks, where an end user communicates to users or servers on another Local Area Network (LAN) using its access point or base station. However, 802.11 supports also direct ad hoc or peer to peer networking between end user devices without an access point while 802.16 end user devices must be in range of the base station.
Wi-Fi and WiMAX are complementary. WiMAX network operators typically provide a WiMAX Subscriber Unit which connects to the metropolitan WiMAX network and provides Wi-Fi within the home or business for local devices (e.g., Laptops, Wi-Fi Handsets, smartphones) for connectivity. This enables the user to place the WiMAX Subscriber Unit in the best reception area (such as a window), and still be able to use the WiMAX network from any place within their residence.

Conformance testing

TTCN-3 test specification language is used for the purposes of specifying conformance tests for WiMAX implementations. The WiMAX test suite is being developed by a Specialist Task Force at ETSI (STF 252).[22]

Associations

WiMAX Forum

The WiMAX Forum is a non profit organization formed to promote the adoption of WiMAX compatible products and services.[23]
A major role for the organization is to certify the interoperability of WiMAX products.[24] Those that pass conformance and interoperability testing achieve the "WiMAX Forum Certified" designation, and can display this mark on their products and marketing materials. Some vendors claim that their equipment is "WiMAX-ready", "WiMAX-compliant", or "pre-WiMAX", if they are not officially WiMAX Forum Certified.

Another role of the WiMAX Forum is to promote the spread of knowledge about WiMAX. In order to do so, it has a certified training program that is currently offered in English and French. It also offers a series of member events and endorses some industry events.

WiMAX Spectrum Owners Alliance


WiSOA logo

WiSOA was the first global organization composed exclusively of owners of WiMAX spectrum with plans to deploy WiMAX technology in those bands. WiSOA focussed on the regulation, commercialisation, and deployment of WiMAX spectrum in the 2.3–2.5 GHz and the 3.4–3.5 GHz ranges. WiSOA merged with the Wireless Broadband Alliance in April 2008. [25]

Competing technologies


Speed vs. Mobility of wireless systems: Wi-Fi, HSPA, UMTS, GSM
Within the marketplace, WiMAX's main competition comes from existing, widely deployed wireless systems such as UMTS, CDMA2000, existing Wi-Fi and mesh networking.
In the future, competition will be from the evolution of the major cellular standards to so-called 4G, high-bandwidth, low-latency, all-IP networks with voice services built on top. The worldwide move to 4G for GSM/UMTS and AMPS/TIA (including CDMA2000) is the 3GPP Long Term Evolution effort. However, it has been noted that the likely performance difference between WiMAX as it stands today and LTE when it is eventually commercially available in 2–3 years time, will be negligible.[citation needed]
LTE is expected to be ratified at the end of 2010, with commercial implementations becoming viable within the next two years.. End of 2009 TeliaSonera started commercial deployment in Oslo and Stockholm, In Denmark the 3 big telecoms are upgrading their network, and will make LTE available during 2010.
In some areas of the world, the wide availability of UMTS and a general desire for standardization has meant spectrum has not been allocated for WiMAX: in July 2005, the EU-wide frequency allocation for WiMAX was blocked.




Harmonization

Early WirelessMAN standards, the European standard HiperMAN and Korean standard WiBro have been harmonized as part of WiMAX and are no longer seen as competition but as complementary. All networks now being deployed in South Korea, the home of the WiBro standard, are now WiMAX.

Comparison

Main article: Comparison of wireless data standards
The neutrality of this article is disputed. Please see the discussion on the talk page. Please do not remove this message until the dispute is resolved. (January 2009)
The following table should be treated with caution because it only shows peak rates which are potentially very misleading. In addition, the comparisons listed are not normalized by physical channel size (i.e., spectrum used to achieve the listed peak rates); this obfuscates spectral efficiency and net through-put capabilities of the different wireless technologies listed below.
Comparison of Mobile Internet Access methods
Standard↓ Family↓ Primary Use↓ Radio Tech↓ Downlink (Mbit/s)↓ Uplink (Mbit/s)↓ Notes↓ LTE UMTS/4GSM General 4G OFDMA/MIMO/SC-FDMA 360 80 LTE-Advanced update expected to offer peak rates of at least 1 Gbit/s fixed speeds and 100 Mbit/s to mobile users. WiMAX 802.16e Mobile Internet MIMO-SOFDMA 144 35 WiMAX update IEEE 802.16m expected offer up to 1 Gbit/s fixed speeds. Flash-OFDM Flash-OFDM Mobile Internet
mobility up to 200mph (350km/h) Flash-OFDM 5.3
10.6
15.9 1.8
3.6
5.4 Mobile range 18miles (30km)
extended range 34 miles (55km) HIPERMAN HIPERMAN Mobile Internet OFDM 56.9 56.9 Wi-Fi 802.11
(11n) Mobile Internet OFDM/MIMO 288.9
(Supports 600Mbps @ 40MHz channel width)

Antenna, RF front end enhancements and minor protocol timer tweaks have helped deploy long range P2P networks compromising on radial coverage, throughput and/or spectra efficiency (310km & 382km).

iBurst 802.20 Mobile Internet HC-SDMA/TDD/MIMO 95 36 Cell Radius: 3–12 km
Speed: 250kmph
Spectral Efficiency: 13 bits/s/Hz/cell
Spectrum Reuse Factor: "1" EDGE Evolution GSM Mobile Internet TDMA/FDD 1.9 0.9 3GPP Release 7 UMTS W-CDMA
HSDPA+HSUPA
HSPA+ UMTS/3GSM General 3G CDMA/FDD

CDMA/FDD/MIMO 0.384
14.4
56 0.384
5.76
22 HSDPA widely deployed. Typical downlink rates today 2 Mbit/s, ~200 kbit/s uplink; HSPA+ downlink up to 56 Mbit/s. UMTS-TDD UMTS/3GSM Mobile Internet CDMA/TDD 16 16 Reported speeds according to IPWireless using 16QAM modulation similar to HSDPA+HSUPA 1xRTT CDMA2000 Mobile phone CDMA 0.144 0.144 Succeeded by EV-DO EV-DO 1x Rev. 0
EV-DO 1x Rev.A
EV-DO Rev.B CDMA2000 Mobile Internet CDMA/FDD 2.45
3.1
4.9xN 0.15
1.8
1.8xN Rev B note: N is the number of 1.25 MHz chunks of spectrum used.
Notes: All speeds are theoretical maximums and will vary by a number of factors, including the use of external antennae, distance from the tower and the ground speed (e.g. communications on a train may be poorer than when standing still). Usually the bandwidth is shared between several terminals. The performance of each technology is determined by a number of constraints, including the spectral efficiency of the technology, the cell sizes used, and the amount of spectrum available. For more information, see Comparison of wireless data standards. See also Comparison of mobile phone standards, Spectral efficiency comparison table and OFDM system comparison table.

Future development

The IEEE 802.16m [1] standard is the core technology for the proposed WiMAX Release 2, which enables more efficient, faster, and more converged data communications. The IEEE 802.16m standard has been submitted to the ITU for IMT-Advanced standardization[26]. IEEE 802.16m is one of the major candidates for IMT-Advanced technologies by ITU. Among many enhancements, IEEE 802.16m systems can provide four times faster[clarification needed] data speed than the current WiMAX Release 1 based on IEEE 802.16e technology.
WiMAX Release 2 will provide strong backward compatibility with Release 1 solutions. It will allow current WiMAX operators to migrate their Release 1 solutions to Release 2 by upgrading channel cards or software of their systems. Also, the subscribers who use currently available WiMAX devices can communicate with new WiMAX Release 2 systems without difficulty.
It is anticipated that in a practical deployment, using 4X2 MIMO in the urban microcell scenario with only a single 20-MHz TDD channel available system wide, the 802.16m system can support both 120 Mbit/s downlink and 60 Mbit/s uplink per site simultaneously. It is expected that the WiMAX Release 2 will be available commercially in the 2011-2012 timeframe.[27]

Interference

A field test conducted by SUIRG (Satellite Users Interference Reduction Group) with support from the U.S. Navy, the Global VSAT Forum, and several member organizations yielded results showing interference at 12 km when using the same channels for both the WiMAX systems and satellites in C-band.[28] The WiMAX Forum has yet to respond.

Deployments

Main article: List of deployed WiMAX networks
As example, Korea launched Wimax at 2nd quarter of 2006 and then launched HSPA one quarter after launched Wimax. At the end of 2008 there were 8.4 million HSPA subscribers and 350,000 Wimax subscribers in Korea. Almost all of HSPA subscribers come from 2G and 3G users who have been tempted to upgrade to new devices by high subsidies, whereas Wimax subscribers almost all are newcomers. Deployment of Wimax is still limited (spotted), whereas there are well over 100 countries where HSPA networks are deployed, and even where there is no HSPA coverage there is backward compatibility (using HSPA devices) to pre-existing networks (GSM and WCDMA) with a roaming infrastructure already in place. In the mean time, the HSPA juggernaut looks unstoppable.[29]
As of April 2010, the WiMAX Forum claims there are over 558 WiMAX (fixed and mobile) networks deployed in over 147 countries.[30]
Yota is the largest WiMAX network operator in the world[31] but has announced that it will move new network deployments to LTE and, subsequently, change its existing networks as well.[32]

Internet access

[hide]Internet access
Network type Wired Wireless
Optical Coaxial cable Twisted pair Phone line Power line Unlicensed terrestrial bands Licensed terrestrial bands Satellite
LAN Ethernet G.hn Ethernet HomePNA · G.hn G.hn Wi-Fi · Bluetooth · DECT · Wireless USB
WAN PON · Ethernet DOCSIS Ethernet Dial-up · ISDN · DSL BPL Muni Wi-Fi GPRS · iBurst · WiBro/WiMAX · UMTS-TDD, HSPA · EVDO · LTE Satellite

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY JOBS

What is Information Technology
Information Technology is a key ingredient for businesses trading in the 21 century. Through better use of communication and IT infrastructure, businesses can now open their doors to international markets as well as competition. Its reach cuts across industry segments and geographical locations. This has fueled the need for well-qualified and skilled information technology professionals mainly in computers and telecommunications.

Some of the career options that can be opted by Information Technology professionals are:


Software and Hardware Engineers
Information technology engineers work on various processes, both hardware and software. They aid in creating the hardware equipment needed for creating the computer systems. The engineers are actively involved in study of business

Hardware engineers create, test and supervise systems that run the computers and enable processes. They ensure that hardware systems are up and running at all times without interrupting the flow of work

Software engineers design and develop software applications that aid businesses run multiple processes in an automated manner.

These jobs may also involve:
• Study client processes to determine their needs for software and hardware.
• Manage a team of developers and engineers .
• Analyze, design and develop software processes.
• Monitor systems, control quality and maintain supplies.
• Evaluation of various flows and processes.Fresh Graduates can start as junior or support engineers. Candidates with over 3-5 years of experience can be considered for the role of Project Leader/Manager. Project Managers generally play a supervisory role and mange a team of computer engineers and information technology specialists. Most technology firms also offer comprehensive internship program that serves as a breeding ground for aspiring information technology professionals.


IT Consultants
Information Technology professionals are increasingly being sought to play the role of consultants to various business. They study the processes like supply chain, inventory management etc and recommend information technology based solutions that will basically make the process error free, simpler and quicker.

Information technology based consultants are required across various industry segments to right up to government organizations. Entreprenuial information technology consultants can also set up their own consulting firms and advice clients independently on how information technology can help their business and augment profits. Information technology professionals can branch out with their own consultancy after a minimum of 5-10 years of experience in the related areas of information technology.


Network Administrator
Network Administrator can work from high schools to big corporations. Their role can be very challenging with multitasking components. Their goal is to run a smoothly functioning computer network—free of bugs, glitches, and interruptions. Example of what a network administrator may do during his day can include computer software; get computer/network up and running again after it crashes; set up new devices and solving computer problems on a consistent basis. This job provides hands on experience on working on networks and administration.

.
Database Specialist
A database specialist creates, customizes and maintains database applications for businesses. They will incorporate not only programming but also planning and design with working with popular database applications such as SQL and Access. Their database programs may range from reporting POS transactions, customer details or web-based applications. Database specialization is a growing area of expertise within IT as well as one very well paid.

IEEE 802.20 Working Group on Mobile Broadband Wireless Access

Project

IEEE 802.20 Working Group on Mobile Broadband Wireless Access

Title

Proposed Technology Description Template for MBWA Proposals

Date Submitted

2005-08-26

Source(s)

Kumar Anubhav
J.N.V Pachadhi Raiyam Sugar Mill Darbhanga Bihar, India

Voice: +91 9199040853
Fax: +91 9472636403
Email: engineer.anubhav@yahoo.in

Re:

Technology Selection Process

Abstract

This document proposes a technology description template to be used for the

MBWA proposals submitted to 802.20

Purpose

Discuss and adopt

Notice

This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE 802.20 Working in

developing the technology selection process for MBWA

Release

The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate

material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the

creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name

any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this

contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce

in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor

also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by

IEEE 802.20.

Patent Policy

The contributor is familiar with IEEE patent policy, as outlined in

Section 6.3 of the IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual

1. Introduction

A need has been identified to define a technology description template for use by proponents

wishing to submit technology proposals to 802.20 for MBWA systems The following table

provides a proposed template based upon the ITU-R template used for IMT-2000 Radio

Transmission Technology proposals. This contribution has been revised as a result of discussions

at the July meeting.

2. Recommendation

It is recommended to review and adopt this table as the technology description template for use in submitting proposals to 802.20 for MBWA.


3. Description of the proposed technology

The proposal has to be described in a detailed form to get an overview and an understanding of the functionalities of the technical approach. This template provides the technical description of the characteristics of a candidate proposal.

The following technical parameters, along with the evaluation matrix, should be provided for each test environment in which the candidate proposal is to operate. This can be done either by preparing:

· a separate template submission for each test environment; or

· a single submission that includes multiple answers for those technical parameters impacted by a test environment.

In addition to the detailed technical description described below, proponents should assure that their submission meets the overall 802.20 objectives as defined in existing documents.

The following table describes the technical parameters needed to characterize a proposal. Proponents should feel free to add any new information if required for a better assessment of their proposal.

IEEE 802.20 may serve both mobile users as well as fixed wireless users sharing common geographical locations and frequency bands. As a result, certain parameters may be designed for one or the other type of user in combination. To account for fixed wireless use of a candidate proposal, the description given in the template should indicate when a parameter has been designed for dual use.

802.20 Proposal technology description template

TABLE OF CONTENTS

A1.1 Test environment support

A1.2 Technical parameters

A1.3 Expected performances

A1.4 Technology design constraints

A1.5 Information required for terrestrial link budget template


A1.1

Test environment support

A1.1.1

In what test environments will the proposal operate?

A1.1.2

If the proposal supports more than one test environment, what test environment does this technology description template address?

A1.1.3

Does the proposal include any features in support of FWA application? Provide detail about the impact of those features on the technical parameters provided in this template, stating whether the technical parameters provided apply for mobile as well as for FWA applications.

A1.2

Technical parameters

NOTE 1 – Parameters for both forward link and reverse link should be described separately, if necessary.

A1.2.1

What is the minimum frequency band required to deploy the system (MHz)?

A1.2.2

What is the duplex method: TDD or FDD?

A1.2.2.1

What is the minimum up/down frequency separation for FDD?

A1.2.2.2

What is requirement of transmit/receive isolation? Does the proposal require a duplexer in either the mobile station (MS) or BS?

A1.2.3

Does the proposal allow asymmetric transmission to use the available spectrum? Characterize.


A1.2.4

What is the RF channel spacing (kHz)? In addition, does the proposal use an interleaved frequency plan?

NOTE 1 – The use of the second adjacent channel instead of the adjacent channel at a neighbouring cluster cell is called “interleaved frequency planning”. If a proponent is going to employ an interleaved frequency plan, the proponent should state so in § A1.2.4 and complete § A1.2.15 with the protection ratio for both the adjacent and second adjacent channel.

A1.2.5

What is the bandwidth per duplex RF channel (MHz) measured at the 3 dB down points? It is given by (bandwidth per RF channel) ´ (1 for TDD and 2 for FDD). Provide detail.

A1.2.5.1

Does the proposal offer multiple or variable RF channel bandwidth capability? If so, are multiple bandwidths or variable bandwidths provided for the purposes of compensating the transmission medium for impairments but intended to be feature transparent to the end user?


A1.2.6

What is the RF channel bit rate (kbit/s)?

NOTE 1 – The maximum modulation rate of RF (after channel encoding, adding of in-band control signalling and any overhead signalling) possible to transmit carrier over an RF channel, i.e. independent of access technology and of modulation schemes.

A1.2.7

Frame structure: describe the frame structure to give sufficient information such as:

frame length,

the number of time slots per frame,

guard time or the number of guard bits,

user information bit rate for each time slot,

channel bit rate (after channel coding),

channel symbol rate (after modulation),

associated control channel (ACCH) bit rate,

power control bit rate.

NOTE 1 – Channel coding may include forward error correction (FEC), cyclic redundancy checking (CRC), ACCH, power control bits and guard bits. Provide detail.

NOTE 2 – Describe the frame structure for forward link and reverse link, respectively.

NOTE 3 – Describe the frame structure for each user information rate.

A1.2.8

Does the proposal use frequency hopping? If so, characterize and explain particularly the impact (e.g. improvements) on system performance.

A1.2.8.1

What is the hopping rate?

A1.2.8.2

What is the number of the hopping frequency sets?

A1.2.8.3

Are BSs synchronized or non-synchronized?

A1.2.9

Does the proposal use a spreading scheme?

A1.2.9.1

What is the chip rate (Mchip/s)? Rate at input to modulator.

A1.2.9.2

What is the processing gain? 10 log (chip rate/information rate).

A1.2.9.3

Explain the uplink and downlink code structures and provide the details about the types (e.g. personal numbering (PN) code, Walsh code) and purposes (e.g. spreading, identification, etc.) of the codes.

A1.2.10

Which access technology does the proposal use: TDMA, FDMA, CDMA, hybrid, or a new technology?

In the case of CDMA, which type of CDMA is used: frequency hopping (FH) or direct sequence (DS) or hybrid? Characterize.


A1.2.11

What is the baseband modulation technique? If both the data modulation and spreading modulation are required, describe in detail.

What is the peak to average power ratio after baseband filtering (dB)?

A1.2.12

What are the channel coding (error handling) rate and form for both the forward and reverse links? E.g., does the proposal adopt:

FEC or other schemes?

Unequal error protection? Provide details.

Soft decision decoding or hard decision decoding? Provide details.

Iterative decoding (e.g. turbo codes)? Provide details.

Other schemes?

A1.2.13

What is the bit interleaving scheme? Provide detailed description for both uplink and downlink.

A1.2.14

Describe the approach taken for the receivers (MS and BS) to cope with multipath propagation effects (e.g. via equalizer, Rake receiver, etc.).

A1.2.14.1

Describe the robustness to intersymbol interference and the specific delay spread profiles that are best or worst for the proposal.

A1.2.14.2

Can rapidly changing delay spread profile be accommodated? Describe.

A1.2.15

What is the adjacent channel protection ratio?

NOTE 1 – In order to maintain robustness to adjacent channel interference, the proposal should have some receiver characteristics that can withstand higher power adjacent channel interference. Specify the maximum allowed relative level of adjacent RF channel power (dBc). Provide detail how this figure is assumed.

A1.2.16

Power classes

A1.2.16.1

Mobile terminal emitted power : what is the radiated antenna power measured at the antenna? (dBm).

A1.2.16.1.1

What is the maximum peak power transmitted while in active or busy state?

A1.2.16.1.2

What is the time average power transmitted while in active or busy state? Provide detailed explanation used to calculate this time average power.

A1.2.16.2

Base station transmit power per RF carrier for terrestrial component

A1.2.16.2.1

What is the maximum peak transmitted power per RF carrier radiated from antenna?

A1.2.16.2.2

What is the average transmitted power per RF carrier radiated from antenna?


A1.2.17

What is the maximum number of voice channels available per RF channel that can be supported at one BS with 1 RF channel (TDD systems) or 1 duplex RF channel pair (FDD systems), while still meeting ITU‑T Recommendation G.726 performance requirements?

A1.2.18

Variable bit rate capabilities : describe the ways the proposal is able to handle variable baseband transmission rates. For example, does the proposal use:

adaptive source and channel coding as a function of RF signal quality?

Variable data rate as a function of user application?

Variable voice/data channel utilization as a function of traffic mix requirements?

Characterize how the bit rate modification is performed. In addition, what are the advantages of your system proposal associated with variable bit rate capabilities?

A1.2.18.1

What are the user information bit rates in each variable bit rate mode?

A1.2.19

What kind of voice coding scheme or codec is assumed to be used in proposed proposal? If the existing specific voice coding scheme or codec is to be used, give the name of it. If a special voice coding scheme or codec (e.g. those not standardized in standardization bodies such as ITU) is indispensable for the proposed proposal, provide detail, e.g. scheme, algorithm, coding rates, coding delays and the number of stochastic code books.

A1.2.19.1

Does the proposal offer multiple voice coding rate capability? Provide detail.

A1.2.20

Data services : are there particular aspects of the proposed technologies which are applicable for the provision of circuit-switched (or emulation), packet-switched or other data services like asymmetric data services? For each service class (A, B, C and D) a description of proposal services should be provided, at least in terms of bit rate, delay and BER/frame error rate (FER).

NOTE 1 – See Recommendation ITU-R M.1224 for the definition of:

“circuit transfer mode”,

“packet transfer mode”,

“connectionless service”,

and for the aid of understanding “circuit switched” and “packet switched” data services.

NOTE 2 – See ITU-T Recommendation I.362 for details about the service classes A, B, C and D.

A1.2.20.1

For delay constrained, connection oriented (Class A).

A1.2.20.2

For delay constrained, connection oriented, variable bit rate (Class B).

A1.2.20.3

For delay unconstrained, connection oriented (Class C).

A1.2.20.4

For delay unconstrained, connectionless (Class D).


A1.2.21

Simultaneous voice/data services: is the proposal capable of providing multiple user services simultaneously with appropriate channel capacity assignment?

NOTE 1 – The following describes the different techniques that are inherent or improve to a great extent the technology described above to be presented.

Description for both BS and MS are required in attributes from § A1.2.22 through § A1.2.23.2.

A1.2.22

Power control characteristics : is a power control scheme included in the proposal? Characterize the impact (e.g. improvements) of supported power control schemes on system performance.

A1.2.22.1

What is the power control step size (dB)?

A1.2.22.2

What are the number of power control cycles per second?

A1.2.22.3

What is the power control dynamic range (dB)?

A1.2.22.4

What is the minimum transmit power level with power control?

A1.2.22.5

What is the residual power variation after power control when proposal is operating? Provide details about the circumstances (e.g. in terms of system characteristics, environment, deployment, MS-speed, etc.) under which this residual power variation appears and which impact it has on the system performance.

A1.2.23

Diversity combining in MS and BS : are diversity combining schemes incorporated in the design of the proposal?

A1.2.23.1

Describe the diversity techniques applied in the MS and at the BS, including micro diversity and macro diversity, characterizing the type of diversity used, for example:

time diversity: repetition, Rake-receiver, etc.,

space diversity: multiple sectors, etc.,

frequency diversity: FH, wideband transmission, etc.,

code diversity: multiple PN codes, multiple FH code, etc.,

other scheme.

Characterize the diversity combining algorithm, for example, switch diversity, maximal ratio combining, equal gain combining. Additionally, provide supporting values for the number of receivers (or demodulators) per cell per mobile user. State the dB of performance improvement introduced by the use of diversity.

For the MS: what is the minimum number of RF receivers (or demodulators) per mobile unit and what is the minimum number of antennas per mobile unit required for the purpose of diversity reception?

These numbers should be consistent to that assumed in the link budget template 2 and that assumed in the calculation of the “capacity” defined at § A1.3.1.5.


A1.2.23.2

What is the degree of improvement expected (dB)? Also indicate the assumed conditions such as BER and FER.

A1.2.24

Handover/automatic radio link transfer (ALT) : does the proposal support handover?

Characterize the type of handover strategy (or strategies) which may be supported, e.g. MS assisted handover. Give explanations on potential advantages, e.g. possible choice of handover algorithms. Provide evidence whenever possible.

A1.2.24.1

What is the break duration (s) when a handover is executed? In this evaluation, a detailed description of the impact of the handover on the service performance should also be given. Explain how the estimate was derived.

A1.2.24.2

For the proposal, can handover cope with rapid decrease in signal strength (e.g. street corner effect)?

Give a detailed description of:

the way the handover is detected, initiated and executed,

how long each of this action lasts (minimum/maximum time (ms)),

the time-out periods for these actions.

A1.2.25

Characterize how the proposal reacts to the system deployment (e.g. necessity to add new cells and/or new carriers) particularly in terms of frequency planning.

A1.2.26

Sharing frequency band capabilities : to what degree is the proposal able to deal with spectrum sharing with IMT‑2000 systems as well as with all other systems:

spectrum sharing between operators,

spectrum sharing with terrestrial and satellite IMT-2000 systems,

spectrum sharing with non-IMT-2000 systems,

other sharing schemes.

A1.2.27

Dynamic channel allocation : characterize the dynamic channel allocation (DCA) schemes which may be supported and characterize their impact on system performance (e.g. in terms of adaptability to varying interference conditions, adaptability to varying traffic conditions, capability to avoid frequency planning, impact on the reuse distance, etc.).

A1.2.28

Mixed cell architecture : how well does the proposal accommodate mixed cell architectures (pico, micro and macrocells)? Does the proposal provide pico, micro and macro cell user service in a single licensed spectrum assignment, with handoff as required between them?

NOTE 1 – Cell definitions are as follows:

pico – cell hex radius: r < 100 m

micro: 100 m < r < 1 000 m

macro: r > 1 000 m.


A1.2.29

Describe any battery saver/intermittent reception capability.

A1.2.29.1

Ability of the MS to conserve standby battery power : provide details about how the proposal conserves standby battery power.

A1.2.30

Signalling transmission scheme : if the proposed system will use proposals for signalling transmission different from those for user data transmission, describe the details of the signalling transmission scheme over the radio interface between terminals and base stations.

A1.2.30.1

Describe the different signalling transfer schemes which may be supported, e.g. in connection with a call, outside a call. Does the proposal support:

– new techniques? Characterize.

– Signalling enhancements for the delivery of multimedia services? Characterize.

A1.2.31

Does the proposal support a bandwidth on demand (BOD) capability? BOD refers specifically to the ability of an end-user to request multi-bearer services. Typically, this is given as the capacity in the form of bits per second of throughput. Multi-bearer services can be implemented by using such technologies as multi-carrier, multi‑time slot or multi-codes. If so, characterize these capabilities.

NOTE 1 – BOD does not refer to the self-adaptive feature of the radio channel to cope with changes in the transmission quality (see § A1.2.5.1).

A1.2.32

Does the proposal support channel aggregation capability to achieve higher user bit rates?

A1.3

Expected performances.

A1.3.1

For terrestrial test environment only.

A1.3.1.1

What is the achievable BER floor level (for voice)?

NOTE 1 – The BER floor level is evaluated under the BER measuring conditions defined in the Evaluation Criteria using the data rates indicated.

A1.3.1.2

What is the achievable BER floor level (for data)?

NOTE 1 – The BER floor level is evaluated under the measuring conditions defined in the Evaluation Criteria using the data rates indicated.

A1.3.1.3

What is the maximum tolerable delay spread (ns) to maintain the voice and data service quality requirements?

NOTE 1 – The BER is an error floor level measured with the Doppler shift given in the BER measuring conditions of the Evaluation Criteria.


A1.3.1.4

What is the maximum tolerable Doppler shift (Hz) to maintain the voice and data service quality requirements?

NOTE 1 – The BER is an error floor level measured with the delay spread given in the BER measuring conditions of the Evaluation Criteria.

A1.3.1.5

Capacity : the capacity of the radio transmission technology has to be evaluated assuming the deployment models described in the Evaluation Criteria and technical parameters from § A1.2.22 through § A1.2.23.2.

A1.3.1.5.1

What is the voice traffic capacity per cell (not per sector): provide the total traffic that can be supported by a single cell (E/MHz/cell) in a total available assigned non-contiguous bandwidth of 30 MHz (15 MHz forward/15 MHz reverse) for FDD mode or contiguous bandwidth of 30 MHz for TDD mode. Provide capacities for all penetration values defined in the deployment model for the test environment in the Evaluation Criteria. The procedure to obtain this value is described in Annex 2. The capacity supported by not a standalone cell but a single cell within contiguous service area should be obtained here.

A1.3.1.5.2

What is the information capacity per cell (not per sector): provide the total number of user-channel information bits which can be supported by a single cell (Mbit/s/MHz/cell) in a total available assigned non‑contiguous bandwidth of 30 MHz (15 MHz forward/15 MHz reverse) for FDD mode or contiguous bandwidth of 30 MHz for TDD mode. Provide capacities for all penetration values defined in the deployment model for the test environment in the Evaluation Criteria. The procedure to obtain this value is described in the Evaluation Criteria. The capacity supported by not a standalone cell but a single cell within contiguous service area should be obtained here.

A1.3.1.6

Does the proposal support sectorization? If yes, provide for each sectorization scheme and the total number of user‑channel information bits which can be supported by a single site (Mbit/s/MHz) (and the number of sectors) in a total available assigned non-contiguous bandwidth of 30 MHz (15 MHz forward/15 MHz reverse) in FDD mode or contiguous bandwidth of 30 MHz in TDD mode.

A1.3.1.7

Coverage efficiency : the coverage efficiency of the radio transmission technology has to be evaluated assuming the deployment models described in the Evaluation Criteria.

A1.3.1.7.1

What is the base site coverage efficiency (km2/site) for the lowest traffic loading in the voice only deployment model? Lowest traffic loading means the lowest penetration case described in the Evaluation Criteria.

A1.3.1.7.2

What is the base site coverage efficiency (km2/site) for the lowest traffic loading in the data only deployment model? Lowest traffic loading means the lowest penetration case described in the Evaluation Criteria.


A1.3.3

Maximum user bit rate (for data) : specify the maximum user bit rate (kbit/s) available in the deployment models described in the Evaluation Criteria.

A1.3.4

What is the maximum range (m) between a user terminal and a BS (prior to hand-off, relay, etc.) under nominal traffic loading and link impairments as defined in the Evaluation Criteria?

A1.3.5

Describe the capability for the use of repeaters.

A1.3.6

Antenna systems : fully describe the antenna systems that can be used and/or have to be used; characterize their impacts on systems performance, (terrestrial only); e.g., does the proposal have the capability for the use of:

remote antennas: describe whether and how remote antenna systems can be used to extend coverage to low traffic density areas;

distributed antennas: describe whether and how distributed antenna designs are used, and in which IMT‑2000 test environments;

Smart antennas (e.g., switched beam, adaptive, etc.): describe how smart antennas can be used and what is their impact on system performance;

other antenna systems.

A1.3.7

Delay (for voice)

A1.3.7.1

What is the radio transmission processing delay due to the overall process of channel coding, bit interleaving, framing, etc., not including source coding? This is given as transmitter delay from the input of the channel coder to the antenna plus the receiver delay from the antenna to the output of the channel decoder. Provide this information for each service being provided. In addition, a detailed description of how this parameter was calculated is required for both the uplink and the downlink.

A1.3.7.2

What is the total estimated round trip delay (ms) to include both the processing delay, propagation delay (terrestrial only) and vocoder delay? Give the estimated delay associated with each of the key attributes described in Fig. 6 that make up the total delay provided.

A1.3.7.3

Does the proposed proposal need echo control?


A1.3.8

What is the R value calculated from the E-Model as given in G.107What is the MOS level for the proposed codec for the relevant test environments given in Annex 2? Specify its absolute MOS value and its relative value with respect to the MOS value of ITU-T Recommendation G.711 (64 k PCM) and ITU-T Recommendation G.726 (32 k ADPCM).

NOTE 1 – If a special voice coding algorithm is indispensable for the proposed proposal, the proponent should declare detail with its performance of the codec such as MOS level. (See § A1.2.19)

A1.3.9

Description of the ability to sustain quality under certain extreme conditions.

A1.3.9.1

System overload (terrestrial only) : characterize system behaviour and performance in such conditions for each test service in the Evaluation Criteria, including potential impact on adjacent cells. Describe the effect on system performance in terms of blocking grade of service for the cases that the load on a particular cell is 125%, 150%, 175%, and 200% of full load. Also describe the effect of blocking on the immediate adjacent cells. Voice service is to be considered here. Full load means a traffic loading which results in 1% call blocking with the BER of 1 ´ 10–3 maintained.

A1.3.9.2

Hardware failures : characterize system behaviour and performance in such conditions. Provide detailed explanation on any calculation.

A1.3.9.3

Interference immunity : characterize system immunity or protection mechanisms against interference. What is the interference detection method? What is the interference avoidance method?

A1.3.10

Characterize the adaptability of the proposal to different and/or time-varying conditions (e.g. propagation, traffic, etc.) that are not considered in the above attributes of § A1.3.

A1.4

Technology design constraints

A1.4.1

Frequency stability : provide transmission frequency stability (not oscillator stability) requirements of the carrier (include long term – 1 year – frequency stability requirements (ppm)).

A1.4.1.1

For BS transmission (terrestrial component only).

A1.4.1.2

For MS transmission.


A1.4.2

Out-of-band and spurious emissions : specify the expected levels of base and mobile transmitter emissions outside the operating channel, as a function of frequency offset.

A1.4.3

Synchronisation requirements : describe proposal’s timing requirements, e.g.

Is BS-to-BS synchronisation required? Provide precise information, the type of synchronisation, i.e., synchronisation of carrier frequency, bit clock, spreading code or frame, and their accuracy.

Is BS-to-network synchronisation required?

State short-term frequency and timing accuracy of BS transmit signal.

State source of external system reference and the accuracy required, if used at BS (for example: derived from wireline network, or GPS receiver).

State free run accuracy of MS frequency and timing reference clock.

State base-to-base bit time alignment requirement over a 24 h period (ms).

A1.4.4

Timing jitter : for BS and MS give:

the maximum jitter on the transmit signal,

the maximum jitter tolerated on the received signal.

Timing jitter is defined as r.m.s. value of the time variance normalized by symbol duration.

A1.4.5

Frequency synthesizer : what is the required step size, switched speed and frequency range of the frequency synthesizer of MSs?

A1.4.6

Does the proposed system require capabilities of fixed networks not generally available today?

A1.4.6.1

Describe the special requirements on the fixed networks for the handover procedure. Provide handover procedure to be employed in proposed proposal in detail.

A1.4.7

Fixed network feature transparency

A1.4.7.1

Which service(s) of the standard set of ISDN bearer services can the proposal pass to users without fixed network modification.

A1.4.8

Characterize any radio resource control capabilities that exist for the provision of roaming between a private (e.g., closed user group) and a public IMT‑2000 operating environment.

A1.4.9

Describe the estimated fixed signalling overhead (e.g., broadcast control channel, power control messaging). Express this information as a percentage of the spectrum which is used for fixed signalling. Provide detailed explanation on your calculations.


A1.4.10

Characterize the linear and broadband transmitter requirements for BS and MS (terrestrial only).

A1.4.11

Are linear receivers required? Characterize the linearity requirements for the receivers for BS and MS (terrestrial only).

A1.4.12

Specify the required dynamic range of receiver

A1.4.13

What are the signal processing estimates for both the handportable and the BS?

MOPS (millions of operations per second) value of parts processed by DSP (digital signal processing),

gate counts excluding DSP,

ROM size requirements for DSP and gate counts (kbytes),

RAM size requirements for DSP and gate counts (kbytes).

NOTE 1 – At a minimum the evaluation should review the signal processing estimates (MOPS, memory requirements, gate counts) required for demodulation, equalization, channel coding, error correction, diversity processing (including Rake receivers), adaptive antenna array processing, modulation, A-D and D-A converters and multiplexing as well as some IF and baseband filtering. For new technologies, there may be additional or alternative requirements (such as FFTs etc.).

NOTE 2 – The signal processing estimates should be declared with the estimated condition such as assumed services, user bit rate and etc.

A1.4.14

Dropped calls : describe how the proposal handles dropped calls. Does the proposed proposal utilize a transparent reconnect procedure – that is, the same as that employed for handoff?

A1.4.15

Characterize the frequency planning requirements:

frequency reuse pattern: given the required C/I and the proposed technologies, specify the frequency cell reuse pattern (e.g. 3-cell, 7-cell, etc.) and, for terrestrial systems, the sectorization schemes assumed;

characterize the frequency management between different cell layers;

does the proposal use an interleaved frequency plan?

are there any frequency channels with particular planning requirements?

all other relevant requirements.

NOTE 1 – The use of the second adjacent channel instead of the adjacent channel at a neighbouring cluster cell is called “interleaved frequency planning”. If a proponent is going to employ an interleaved frequency plan, the proponent should state so in § A1.2.4 and complete § A1.2.15 with the protection ratio for both the adjacent and second adjacent channel.


A1.4.16

Describe the capability of the proposal to facilitate the evolution of existing radio transmission technologies used in mobile telecommunication systems to migrate toward this proposal. Provide detail any impact and constraint on evolution.

A1.4.17

Are there any special requirements for base site implementation? Are there any features which simplify implementation of base sites? (terrestrial only)

A1.5

Proponents shall attach the filled in link budget template given in the Evaluation Criteria.

Information required for terrestrial link budget template

Proponents should fulfil the link budget template given in the evaluation criteriaand answer the following questions.

A1.5.1

What is the BS noise figure (dB)?

A1.5.2

What is the MS noise figure (dB)?

A1.5.3

What is the BS antenna gain (dBi)?

A1.5.4

What is the MS antenna gain (dBi)?

A1.5.5

What is the cable, connector and combiner losses (dB)?

A1.5.6

What are the number of traffic channels per RF carrier?

A1.5.7

What is the proposal operating point (BER/FER) for the required Eb/N0 in the link budget template?

A1.5.8

What is the ratio of intra-sector interference to sum of intra-sector interference and inter-sector interference within a cell (dB)?

A1.5.9

What is the ratio of in-cell interference to total interference (dB)?

A1.5.10

What is the occupied bandwidth (99%) (Hz)?

A1.5.11

What is the information rate (dBHz)?

Rate This Tip: